[xmlsec] Small request

Roumen Petrov xmlsec at roumenpetrov.info
Tue Mar 26 15:05:11 PDT 2013

Aleksey Sanin wrote:
> These files are part of the released .tar.gz

Yes. Let me expain in brief  bellow.

> Aleksey
> On 3/25/13 2:47 PM, Roumen Petrov wrote:
>> HI All,
>> Aleksey Sanin wrote:
>>> OK, I've tried :) Not 100% sure it will fix the RH bug problem
>>> Aleksey
>>> On 3/24/13 6:54 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>>>>     Hi Aleksey and all,
>>>>     For the next releases, could you update to autoconf 2.69 to be able
>>>> to build on ARM 64bits when it arrives without needing to patch
>>>> config.guess/config.sub ?
>>>>     This correspond to the downstream Fedora bug
>>>>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=926809
>>>> there is a patch for interested parties in the meantime :-)
>> Files like config.sub and config.guests are part of automake repository.
>> Both files are not in xmlsec repository ( ref
>> https://git.gnome.org/browse/xmlsec/tree/ ).
>> I cannot see relation to autoconf . Bootstrap script will add to
>> distribution tarbal and depending from automake version those files may
>> support requested ARM hosts.
>> I think that after bootstrap, is save to replace  both files with more
>> update version. May be best solution is to fetch current files from
>> primary source ( http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/automake.git/tree/lib ) .

1) build repository
after bootstrap process replace files XXX
2) build form source tarbal
after extract
2.1) run bootstrap and replace files XXX
2.2)  replace files XXX

3) continue with regular package creation.

Regarding issue 926809 I expect that repack of package FOO with new 
config.XXX is enough .


More information about the xmlsec mailing list