[xmlsec] Re: automating tests for xmlsec1
aleksey at aleksey.com
Wed Oct 5 08:44:30 PDT 2005
I do accept patches :)
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 October 2005 10:27 am, Aleksey Sanin wrote:
> = Which version of openssl do you use? It is expected to have some
> = tests fail for openssl 0.9.7 and 0.9.6 just because not all crypto
> = algorithms are supported. Same goes to NSS. The only crypto library
> = that supports everything and for which all tests should pass is
> = openssl 0.9.8.
> Thank you for your explanation. However, when the test encounters a
> missing (rather than an buggy) algorithm -- should not it say something
> like "skipped" instead of "failed" or "error"?
> I'd like the test-target of the port to fail if it detects a
> miscompilation (or mislinkage), but work otherwise.
> There ought to be a simple way to automate the detection of such bugs.
More information about the xmlsec