[xmlsec] namespace definition significant ?

[Roland Hedberg]

Does this mean that I have to get the application upstream to make sure the xmlns specification is there or is there some way I can prevent xmlsec1 from adding it ?


On Apr 13, 2011, at 15:42, Aleksey Sanin wrote:

> Yes.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n
> 
> Aleksey
> 
> 
> On 4/13/11 6:41 AM, Roland Hedberg wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> Trying to find out why a signature verification failed.
>> So, I compared what I got and what xmlsec1 has as predigest data.
>> 
>> Nothing that I could see except for the fact that xmlsec1 in the predigest data has added xmlns specifications for xsi.
>> 
>> <ns1:Attribute FriendlyName="eduPersonEntitlement" Name="urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.5923.1.1.1.7" NameFormat="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:attrname-format:uri"><ns1:AttributeValue xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="xs:string">foo</ns1:AttributeValue></ns1:Attribute>
>> 
>> The original was:
>> 
>> <ns1:Attribute FriendlyName="eduPersonEntitlement" Name="urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.5923.1.1.1.7" NameFormat="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:attrname-format:uri"><ns1:AttributeValue xsi:type="xs:string">foo</ns1:AttributeValue></ns1:Attribute>
>> 
>> Is this significant ??
>> 
>> --Roland
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmlsec mailing list
>> xmlsec at aleksey.com
>> http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec

--Roland