[xmlsec] Win98 support for xmlSecMSCryptoDigestInitialize
wsh at xs4all.nl
Fri Nov 18 11:41:52 PST 2005
On Monday 14 November 2005 19:23, xs04.jmdesp at free.fr wrote:
> So I think MS_STRONG_PROV should be replaced by MS_ENHANCED_PROV
> everywhere, and if the machine doesn't have MS_ENHANCED_PROV, the user
> should be told to upgrade it to support 128 bits.
> OTOH maybe it's time for xmlsec to begin to think about MS_ENH_RSA_AES_PROV
> in signatures because of it's support for SHA-2 algorithms, even if only
> the most up to date platforms have it.
I think you have 2 valid points here. Do you have any idea what platform
exactly is providing MS_ENH_RSA_AES_PROV provider support?
More information about the xmlsec