[xmlsec] building without DTD validation support in libxml

Daniel Veillard veillard at redhat.com
Thu May 12 08:58:07 PDT 2005

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:56:02AM -0400, Rich Salz wrote:
> I absolutely agree with you about trade-offs and the "risk" of building 
> generic software that only implements part of XML.

  :-) we agree, just that mail makes it less obvious :-)


Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard at redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

More information about the xmlsec mailing list