[xmlsec] is it possible to do signatures with AES?

Mark Ivey zovirl1_list at sbcglobal.net
Thu Dec 18 09:40:23 PST 2003


I've been looking into this a bit more.  As far as I can tell there are
no known plaintext attacks against AES.  Am I missing something?  Or is
it just bad in theory to add to the number of plaintexts available for a
key?

-Mark Ivey-

On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 13:35, Mark Ivey wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 13:32, Rich Salz wrote:
> > > Is it possible to do XML signatures using the AES algorithm instead of
> > > RSA?
> > 
> > I don't think this makes a lot of sense.  Are you saying to do something 
> > like AES-encrypt the SHA-1 message digest?  That would be bad -- it 
> > would mean that every signed document is a adding to known-plaintext 
> > attacks against the AES key, for example.
> > 
> > Perhaps you want to use HMAC?
> > 	/r$
> 
> Oh, that explains why I couldn't find any info on how to do it.  Thanks
> :)
> 
> -Mark Ivey-
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xmlsec mailing list
> xmlsec at aleksey.com
> http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec




More information about the xmlsec mailing list