[xmlsec] http://www.w3.org/2000/02/xmldsig#

Jesse Pelton jsp at PKC.com
Fri Oct 3 09:04:15 PDT 2003

The URL in his subject line corresponds to a draft of the signature spec.
It's the same as the namespace declaration for his sample signature.  Maybe
this is the root of the whole 3D-Secure problem.  Is it possible that the
draft allows more latitude for Reference URIs than the spec?  (Section
4.3.3, which describes the Reference element, is certainly quite different
in the two documents.)

Just a thought.  I don't have time to chase it down right now.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aleksey Sanin [mailto:aleksey at aleksey.com] 
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 11:23 AM
> To: Slava Kostin
> Cc: xmlsec at aleksey.com
> Subject: Re: [xmlsec] http://www.w3.org/2000/02/xmldsig#
> Hm... I am not sure which standard are you speaking but it seems to
> me that Visa3D *does not* use xml signature spec from w3c. I wonder
> if there is someone who can tell them this and be listened :)

More information about the xmlsec mailing list