[xmlsec] versioning and library naming policies
aleksey at aleksey.com
Wed Apr 2 16:16:46 PST 2003
From what I am hearing, the goal is a *full* independence: users should
to have two different major releases installed in parallel. And binary
have API (option flags and/or features, for example).
Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
> Aleksey Sanin wrote:
> > Well, you have valid points but I really don't like "xmlsec-1.1" as a
> > filename for
> > an executable.
>You don't need to have any version numbers in the executable programs'
>file names. Older versions should be installed in separate directories
>and people who want to use older versions can point their PATH to those
>xmlsec mailing list
>xmlsec at aleksey.com
More information about the xmlsec