[xmlsec] versioning and library naming policies
aleksey at aleksey.com
Wed Apr 2 14:03:52 PST 2003
Well, I have to disagree with this. If you use development release, then
doing on you own. Nobody promises nothing. IMHO, development release are
*not* intended to be packaged, incuded in distributions, whatsoever.
John Belmonte wrote:
> Rich Salz wrote:
>> Disagree. You can change N when you start an incompatible branch, not
>> during development.
> I've been trying to point out that there is nothing magical about a
> development release. Development releases often get packaged as rpm's
> and deb's, and need to play nice just as stable releases. The entity
> using the library needs to know if binary compatibility was broken,
> even within the sequence of releases in a development branch.
More information about the xmlsec