[xmlsec] versioning and library naming policies
aleksey at aleksey.com
Mon Mar 31 17:45:18 PST 2003
I would be happy to make this stuff seamless for anyone myself and I
have no problems
with adding the "-release N.M" option. However, this does not solve
static libraries problem.
They still have no version number at all. Ideas?
John Belmonte wrote:
> In perhaps simpler terms, I suggest that xmlsec use the -release
> option of libtool, using the major version numbers. For example, when
> releasing 0.0.15, use:
> -release 0.0
> This means that compatibilty is broken whenever a point release is
> made (0.1, 0.2, etc.), but that seems likely to happen in any case.
More information about the xmlsec