[xmlsec] enhancement to xmlsec
aleksey at aleksey.com
Thu Dec 19 08:57:27 PST 2002
Thanks a lot! I just know that any non trivial knowledge (like "starting
might be lost other the time :) The only problem I have is that I don't
see attachment :)
Can you resend it, please?
Moultrie, Ferrell (ISSAtlanta) wrote:
> Done. I didn't think the overload was particularly troublesome since
>the XPath syntax was clearly different from a node-name but the approach
>you suggested is cleaner and without ambiguity. I'm attaching diffs
>against 0.0.10 as before plus an additional diff (-b) which is smaller
>and removes some (possibly gratuitous) white-space editing I'd done
>while implementing the code. Your choice as to which to check-in.
More information about the xmlsec