<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid3EDE912B.2020004@netscape.com">If you
give people a safe with a provision to lock it, but they want to<br>
leave it unlocked, not much you can do about it :).<br>
But if you refuse to give them a safe without a locking provision,
atleast<br>
you're doing your part in discouraging bad habits....</blockquote>
I think you misunderstood me. I never said that I do not want ot
provide a safe.<br>
The only thing I said is that I do not want to say that you shouldn't
keep your<br>
money w/o a safe if you understand what are you doing (for example,<br>
you put your money in house with 24x7 guards.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid3EDE912B.2020004@netscape.com">Nothing
else.<br>
The difference between --privkey and --pkcs8 is marginal really.<br>
I lean towards --privkey because it becomes immediately obvious<br>
what the arg is. "pkcs8" may not be common knowledge. <br>
</blockquote>
The command line becames bigger and bigger :) <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid3EDE912B.2020004@netscape.com"> In
either case, your test scripts will need another parameter in order<br>
to support all pvt key formats (der, pem, pkcs8 der, pkcs8 pem).<br>
</blockquote>
Oh, yes. You are right :(<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid3EDE912B.2020004@netscape.com"> I'll
send the changes in a few days.</blockquote>
Let me know if you want me to help you with something :)<br>
<br>
Aleksey<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>